
Anna worked with me way back in the 1970’s. She strongly and forcefully recommended that I try a new vitamin pill made from bee eye retinas. She claimed that it contained every known vitamin plus three of the unknown vitamins.
ChatGPT said:
That sounds exactly like the kind of thing that circulated in the 1970sâhalf enthusiasm, half mystery, and a good dose of salesmanship.
A few thoughts, looking at it with todayâs knowledge:
1. âBee eye retinasâ isnât a real vitamin source
- Bees do have compound eyes, but thereâs no recognized supplement made from âbee retinas.â
- Even if someone processed insect tissue, it wouldnât magically contain all vitamins.
2. âEvery known vitamin plus three unknown onesâ is a red flag
- By definition, a vitamin is something identified, named, and studied.
- If itâs âunknown,â it isnât yet classified as a vitamin.
- This kind of phrasing was (and still is) classic marketing languageâdesigned to sound scientific while being impossible to verify.
Note that the AI apparently believes that I’m taking Anna seriously and it first educates me that the back of bee eyes “isn’t a real vitamin source” and now it is warning me how to recognize “red flags.” The AI later offers to help me find the specific pill (just in case I wanted to eat some?).
3. The 1970s supplement boom
- That era saw a surge in ânatural miracleâ productsâroyal jelly, bee pollen, glandular extracts, etc.
- Many were promoted through word-of-mouth or small distributors rather than rigorous science.
4. What might Anna actually have been referring to?
A few possibilities:
- Bee pollen supplements (very popular at the time)
- Royal jelly products
- Or simply a misremembered or rebranded product with an exotic-sounding ingredient
5. The human side of it
Whatâs interesting isnât just the productâitâs Annaâs conviction. People often:
- Want to share something they believe improved their own health
- Use strong language because they feel theyâve discovered something âhiddenâ
It reminds me of how ideas spread socially more than scientifically.
If youâre curious, Iâd enjoy helping you track down what product she might actually have meant. Do you remember anything about:
- The name of the pill?
- Where she got it (mail order, health food store, distributor)?
- Or what it was supposed to do for you?
Those little details can sometimes crack the whole mystery.
You said:
I thought it was hilarious.
ChatGPT said:
It is hilariousâand in a very specific, almost timeless way.
Thereâs something wonderful about the absolute confidence of it:
not just vitamins⊠but all vitamins⊠plus a few we havenât even discovered yet!
Itâs the kind of claim that collapses the moment you look at it sidewaysâbut when delivered with enough conviction, it somehow sounds almost plausible for a split second.
It also has that classic 1970s flavor:
- a little bit of science vocabulary
- a little bit of ânature knows bestâ
- and a bold leap straight into the unknown
What really makes it funny, though, is the escalation. She could have stopped at âvery nutritious.â But noâshe went all the way to âthree unknown vitamins.â Thatâs almost poetic.
It reminds me of a general rule:
The more untestable the claim, the more confidently it tends to be delivered.
You probably recognized that instantlyâwhich is why it struck you as funny rather than persuasive. But I suspect Anna genuinely believed she was passing along something valuable.

Leave a comment